Back to Search Start Over

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage of First Intent With a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent vs Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (ELEMENT Trial).

Authors :
Chen YI
Sahai A
Donatelli G
Lam E
Forbes N
Mosko J
Paquin SC
Donnellan F
Chatterjee A
Telford J
Miller C
Desilets E
Sandha G
Kenshil S
Mohamed R
May G
Gan I
Barkun J
Calo N
Nawawi A
Friedman G
Cohen A
Maniere T
Chaudhury P
Metrakos P
Zogopoulos G
Bessissow A
Khalil JA
Baffis V
Waschke K
Parent J
Soulellis C
Khashab M
Kunda R
Geraci O
Martel M
Schwartzman K
Fiore JF Jr
Rahme E
Barkun A
Source :
Gastroenterology [Gastroenterology] 2023 Nov; Vol. 165 (5), pp. 1249-1261.e5. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Aug 06.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background & Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent (EUS-CDS) is a promising modality for management of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) with potential for better stent patency. We compared its outcomes with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with metal stenting (ERCP-M).<br />Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients with MDBO secondary to borderline resectable, locally advanced, or unresectable peri-ampullary cancers across 10 Canadian institutions and 1 French institution. This was a superiority trial with a noninferiority assessment of technical success. Patients were randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP-M. The primary end point was the rate of stent dysfunction at 1 year, considering competing risks of death, clinical failure, and surgical resection. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principles.<br />Results: From February 2019 to February 2022, 144 patients were recruited; 73 were randomized to EUS-CDS and 71 were randomized to ERCP-M. The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. Technical success was achieved in 90.4% (95% CI, 81.5% to 95.3%) of EUS-CDS and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.7% to 90.1%) of ERCP-M with a risk difference of 7.3% (95% CI, -4.0% to 18.8%) indicating noninferiority. Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96). No differences in adverse events, pancreaticoduodenectomy and oncologic outcomes, or quality of life were noted.<br />Conclusions: Although not superior in stent function, EUS-CDS is an efficient and safe alternative to ERCP-M in patients with MDBO. These findings provide evidence for greater adoption of EUS-CDS in clinical practice as a complementary and exchangeable first-line modality to ERCP in patients with MDBO.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov, Number: NCT03870386.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0012
Volume :
165
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastroenterology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37549753
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.07.024