Multimodal analysis of the biomechanical impact of knee angle on the Sit-to-Stand transition.

Background: The Sit-to-Stand (STS) transition is one of the most used activities of daily living and vital for independence. Neurological, or physical injuries impairing functional mobility or sensory feedback often require rehabilitative programs or therapeutic interventions. Understanding the biomechanical elements of daily movements and the interaction between these elements may help inform rehabilitation protocols and optimize targeted interventions, such as stimulation protocols.
Research Question: What are the effects of different initial knee angle, arm facilitation and proprioceptive input on leg muscle activation patterns and balance during and after a sit-to-stand?
Methods: EMG of four lower limb muscles were recorded in 20 healthy participants as well centre-of-pressure sway amplitude and velocity, as participants stood from a seated position. Initial knee angles were set to various levels of extension (80°, 90°, 100°) and surface stability and arm facilitation were altered using a foam mat or crossing arms. Data were analysed across 3 phases of the STS transition.
Results: More extended knee angles resulted in greater mediolateral sway during each phase (p < .01) and had a detrimental effect on anterior-posterior sway in phases 1 and 3. EMG data suggested more extended initial knee angles also increased EMG activity of the Tibialis Anterior (p < .001) and Bicep Femoris (p < .02) within Phases 1 and 2 to assist lift and stabilisation.
Significance: Findings of this study outline phase-based muscle involvement as well as the compounding effects of reduced proprioceptive input and knee angle, on difficulty of the STS transition. Such results emphasising the need to take sensory and mobility issues into consideration when designing rehabilitative programs or stimulation control systems.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)