Back to Search Start Over

Do Clinical Exercise Tests Permit Exercise Threshold Identification in Patients Referred to Cardiac Rehabilitation?

Authors :
Keltz RR
Hartley T
Huitema AA
McKelvie RS
Suskin NG
Keir DA
Source :
The Canadian journal of cardiology [Can J Cardiol] 2023 Nov; Vol. 39 (11), pp. 1701-1711. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 28.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the feasibility of "threshold-based" aerobic exercise prescription in cardiovascular disease, we aimed to quantify the proportion of patients whose clinical cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) permit identification of estimated lactate threshold (θ <subscript>LT</subscript> ) and respiratory compensation point (RCP) and to characterize the variability at which these thresholds occur.<br />Methods: Breath-by-breath CPET data of 1102 patients (65 ± 12 years) referred to cardiac rehabilitation were analyzed to identify peak O <subscript>2</subscript> uptake (V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> ; mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> and mL·kg <superscript>-1</superscript> ·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ) and θ <subscript>LT</subscript> and RCP (reported as V˙O <subscript>2</subscript> , %V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> , and %peak heart rate [%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> ]). Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of thresholds: group 0: neither θ <subscript>LT</subscript> nor RCP; group 1: θ <subscript>LT</subscript> only; and group 2: both θ <subscript>LT</subscript> and RCP.<br />Results: Mean V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> was 1523 ± 627 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> (range: 315-3789 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ) or 18.0 ± 6.5 mL·kg <superscript>-1</superscript> ·min <superscript>-1</superscript> (5.2-46.5 mL·kg <superscript>-1</superscript> ·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ) and HR <subscript>peak</subscript> was 123 ± 24 beats per minute (bpm) (52 bpm-207 bpm). There were 556 patients (50%) in group 0, 196 (18%) in group 1, and 350 (32%) in group 2. In group 1, mean θ <subscript>LT</subscript> was 1240 ± 410 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> (580-2560 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ), 75% ± 8%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> (52%-92%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> ), or 84% ± 6%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> (64%-96%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> ). In group 2, θ <subscript>LT</subscript> was 1390 ± 360 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> (640-2430 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ), 70% ± 8%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> (41%-88%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> ), or 78% ± 7%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> (52%-96%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> ), and RCP was 1680 ± 440 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> (730-3090 mL·min <superscript>-1</superscript> ), 84% ± 7%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> (54%-99%V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> ), or 87% ± 6%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> (59%-99%HR <subscript>peak</subscript> ). Compared with group 1, θ <subscript>LT</subscript> in group 2 occurred at a higher V˙O <subscript>2</subscript> but lower %V˙O <subscript>2peak</subscript> and %HR <subscript>peak</subscript> (P < 0.05).<br />Conclusions: Only 32% of CPETs exhibited both θ <subscript>LT</subscript> and RCP despite flexibility in protocol options. Commonly used step-based protocols are suboptimal for "threshold-based" exercise prescription.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1916-7075
Volume :
39
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Canadian journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37517474
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2023.07.029