Back to Search Start Over

Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Authors :
Cairns A
Chagpar AB
Dupont E
Levine EA
Gass JS
Chiba A
Ollila DW
Howard-McNatt M
Source :
Annals of surgical oncology [Ann Surg Oncol] 2023 Oct; Vol. 30 (10), pp. 6053-6058. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 28.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins.<br />Patients and Methods: The SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins.<br />Results: A total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29-94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1-9.3 cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% (44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status.<br />Conclusion: These data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.<br /> (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-4681
Volume :
30
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37505353
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13884-8