Back to Search Start Over

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Triplex Infections (Combined Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus) among Pregnant Women in Nigeria.

Authors :
Eleje GU
Loto OM
Usman HA
Onubogu CU
Fiebai PO
Akaba GO
Rabiu A
Mbachu II
Chibuzor MT
Chukwuanukwu RC
Joe-Ikechebelu NN
Igbodike EP
Egeonu RO
Oppah IC
Ogwaluonye UC
Nwankwo CH
Kalu SO
Chigbo CG
Ogbuagu CN
Chukwurah SN
Uzochukwu CE
Ahmed A
Jibuaku CH
Inuyomi SO
Adesoji BA
Anyang UI
Emeka EA
Igue OE
Okoro OD
Aja PO
Chidozie CP
Ibrahim HS
Aliyu FE
Ugwuoroko HC
Numan AI
Omoruyi SA
Umeononihu OS
Okoro CC
Nwaeju IK
Onwuegbuna AA
Eleje LI
Ikwuka DC
Umeh EO
Nweje SI
Ajuba IC
Ugwu AO
Ebubedike UR
Malachy DE
Okafor CG
Obiegbu NP
Ugwu EO
Yakasai IA
Ezechi OC
Ikechebelu JI
Source :
Obstetrics and gynecology international [Obstet Gynecol Int] 2023 Jul 17; Vol. 2023, pp. 3551297. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 17 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: We systematically identified the prevalence of triplex infections (combined human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV)) in pregnancy.<br />Methods: To gather information on the frequency of triplex infections, we searched the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Without regard to language, we utilized search terms that covered HIV, HBV, HCV, and pregnancy. Pregnant women with triplex infections of HIV, HBV, and HCV were included in studies that also examined the prevalence of triplex infections. Review Manager 5.4.1 was employed to conduct the meta-analysis. Critical appraisal and bias tool risk data were provided as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and I <superscript>2</superscript> was used as the statistical measure of heterogeneity. The checklist was created by Hoy and colleagues. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO, under the registration number CRD42020202583.<br />Results: Eight studies involving 5314 women were included. We identified one ongoing study. Pooled prevalence of triplex infections was 0.03% (95% CI: 0.02-0.04%) according to meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significantly high prevalence of 0.08% (95% CI: 0.06-0.10%; 3863 women) in HIV-positive population than 0.00% (95% CI:-0.00-0.00; 1451 women; P < 0.001) in general obstetric population. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the pooled prevalence between studies published between 2001 and 2010 and between 2011 and 2021 (0.14% (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.16 versus 0.03% (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.04%; P < 0.001))) and participants recruited in the period between 2001 and 2011 and between 2012 and 2021 (0.13% (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.21; p =0.002 versus 0.00% (95% CI: -0.00 to 0.00%; p =1.00))), respectively.<br />Conclusion: The combined prevalence of prenatal triplex infections was 0.03%, with rates notably higher among the group of pregnant women who were HIV-positive and during the recruitment period that took place before 2012. This prevalence still necessitates screening for these infections as necessary.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 George Uchenna Eleje et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1687-9589
Volume :
2023
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Obstetrics and gynecology international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37492627
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3551297