Should we resect more proximally? Outcomes of toe amputation versus ray resection in patients with infected diabetic ulcers and osteomyelitis. A preliminary study and new treatment algorithm.

Background: The treatment of severe diabetic toe infection complicated with osteomyelitis is often surgical. The decision on the level of amputation, when required, is difficult. Very few articles reported comparative outcomes between toe amputation and ray resection, and only in relation to the hallux. The aim of this preliminary report is to record the results of these procedures when performed on all toes.
Methods: This is a comparative retrospective study where the charts of a continuous series of 44 patients (48 procedures) with diabetic forefoot infection were analyzed. Only cases of severe infection with confirmed osteomyelitis were included. Two groups were compared based on the level of amputation: the toe amputation group (at and distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint) and the ray resection group (distal to tarsometatarsal joint). The primary outcomes were defined as osteomyelitis recurrence and re-amputation.
Results: Outcome comparison between toe amputation and ray resection; 47.3 % vs. 51.7 % had a recurrence of their osteomyelitis (p = 0.8), 36.8 % vs. 34.5 % had a re-amputation (p = 0.02). Re-amputation was needed in 25 % of cases following hallux/first ray index procedure while the same was required in 39 % of cases following lateral toes/rays index procedures (p = 0.4). Both primary outcomes were correlated to CDK, smoking and creatinine level.
Conclusions: Bone infection recurrence and re-amputation are highly prevalent in patients undergoing initial amputation for severe diabetic toe infection. A more aggressive approach in the form of a more proximal level of index amputation might be needed when treating severe toe infections with osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
(Copyright © 2023 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)