Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound on Prehospital Decision Making by HEMS Physicians in Critically Ill and Injured Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors :
Vianen NJ
Van Lieshout EMM
Vlasveld KHA
Maissan IM
Gerritsen PC
Den Hartog D
Verhofstad MHJ
Van Vledder MG
Source :
Prehospital and disaster medicine [Prehosp Disaster Med] 2023 Aug; Vol. 38 (4), pp. 444-449. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 17.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have shown the additional benefit of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Since organization of EMS may vary significantly across countries, the value of POCUS likely depends on the prehospital system in which it is used. In order to be able to optimally implement POCUS and develop a tailored training curriculum, it is important to know how often POCUS is currently used, for which indications it is used, and how it affects decision making. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the percentage of patients in whom POCUS was used by Dutch Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) crews; (2) to determine how often POCUS findings led to changes in on-scene management; and (3) what these changes were.<br />Methods: Patients who received prehospital care from December 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 by a single HEMS crew were included in this prospective cohort study. Clinical data and specific data on POCUS examination, findings, and therapeutic consequences were collected and analyzed.<br />Results: During the study period, on-scene HEMS care was provided to 612 patients, of which 211 (34.5%) patients underwent POCUS. Of these, 209 (34.2%) patients with a median age of 45 years were included. There were 131 (62.7%) trauma patients, and 70 (33.7%) of the included patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The median reported time of POCUS examination was three (P <subscript>25</subscript> -P <subscript>75</subscript> 2-5) minutes. Median prolongation of on-scene time was zero (P <subscript>25</subscript> -P <subscript>75</subscript> 0-1) minutes. In 85 (40.7%) patients, POCUS examination had therapeutic consequence: POCUS was found to impact treatment decisions in 34 (26.0%) trauma patients and 51 (65.4%) non-trauma patients. In patients with cardiac arrest, POCUS was most often used to aid decision making with regard to terminating or continuing resuscitation (28 patients; 13.4%).<br />Conclusion: During the study period, POCUS examination was used in 34.5% of all prehospital HEMS patients and had a therapeutic consequence in 40.7% of patients. In trauma patients, POCUS seems to be most effective for patient triage and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. Moreover, POCUS can be of significant value in patients undergoing CPR. A tailored HEMS POCUS training curriculum should include ultrasound techniques for trauma and cardiac arrest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1945-1938
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Prehospital and disaster medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37458496
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23006003