Back to Search Start Over

Effects of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on Maxillary Growth in Cleft Lip or Palate Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors :
Kannan P
Verma S
Kumar V
Kumar Verma R
Pal Singh S
Source :
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association [Cleft Palate Craniofac J] 2024 Nov; Vol. 61 (11), pp. 1860-1872. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 12.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

To assess the effect of secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) on maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip or palate (UCL/P).<br />Systematic review and Meta-analysis.<br />Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and manual search was performed to assess the maxillary growth following SABG in UCL/P patients.<br />Non-syndromic patients with UCL/P.<br />Comparison of maxillary growth between patients with UCL/P who underwent SABG and UCL/P patients who had not undergone SABG or non-cleft control.<br />39 of the identified 233 articles were assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria after duplicate removal and title and abstract reading. 7 articles (1 prospective, and 6 retrospective studies) were included in the qualitative analysis and 2 articles were subjected to quantitative analysis. Four studies had a low risk of bias and three studies had a moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction of SNA and no significant difference in ANB in the SABG group compared to the non-cleft control group(I <superscript>2 </superscript> = 0%). There was no significant difference in ANB between SABG and non-cleft control; however, results showed high heterogeneity(I <superscript>2 </superscript> = 83%). Meta-analysis of SNA and ANB showed no significant difference between SABG and the cleft control group; however, there was high heterogeneity.<br />The studies showed a low to moderate risk of bias. SABG causes inhibition of maxillary growth in patients with cleft lip or palate when compared to patients with non-cleft control. Due to high heterogeneity, comparison to cleft control showed insufficient evidence.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1545-1569
Volume :
61
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37438927
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231188600