Long-Term Outcomes of Bovine versus Porcine Mitral Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Analysis.

Introduction: Recent national guidelines recommending mitral valve replacement (MVR) for severe secondary mitral regurgitation have resulted in an increased utilization of mitral bioprosthesis. There is a paucity of data on how longitudinal clinical outcomes vary by prosthesis type. We examined long-term survival and risk of reoperation between patients having bovine vs. porcine MVR. Study Design . A retrospective analysis of MVR or MVR + coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) from 2001 to 2017 among seven hospitals reporting to a prospectively maintained clinical registry was conducted. The analytic cohort included 1,284 patients undergoing MVR (801 bovine and 483 porcine). Baseline comorbidities were balanced using 1 : 1 propensity score matching with 432 patients in each group. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included in-hospital morbidity, 30-day mortality, length of stay, and risk of reoperation.
Results: In the overall cohort, patients receiving porcine valves were more likely to have diabetes (19% bovine vs. 29% porcine; p < 0.001), COPD (20% bovine vs. 27% porcine; p =0.008), dialysis or creatinine >2 mg/dL (4% bovine vs. 7% porcine; p =0.03), and coronary artery disease (65% bovine vs. 77% porcine; p < 0.001). There was no difference in stroke, acute kidney injury, mediastinitis, pneumonia, length of stay, in-hospital morbidity, or 30-day mortality. In the overall cohort, there was a difference in long-term survival (porcine HR 1.17 (95% CI: 1.00-1.37; p =050)). However, there was no difference in reoperation (porcine HR 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.32; p =0.185)). In the propensity-matched cohort, patients were matched on all baseline characteristics. There was no difference in postoperative complications or in-hospital morbidity and 30-day mortality. After 1 : 1 propensity score matching, there was no difference in long-term survival (porcine HR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.81-1.17; p =0.756)) or risk of reoperation (porcine HR 0.54 (95% CI: 0.20-1.47; p =0.225)).
Conclusions: In this multicenter analysis of patients undergoing bioprosthetic MVR, there was no difference in perioperative complications and risk of reoperation of long-term survival after matching.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 M. Broadwin et al.)