Back to Search Start Over

A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation.

Authors :
Haudebourg AF
Moncomble E
Lesimple A
Delamaire F
Louis B
Mekontso Dessap A
Mercat A
Richard JC
Beloncle F
Carteaux G
Source :
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2023 Jul 07; Vol. 27 (1), pp. 273. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 07.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min.<br />Objectives: To validate the conductive pressure (P <subscript>cond</subscript> ) method, which compare the P <subscript>cond</subscript> -defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP-to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method.<br />Methods: The proof-of-concept of the P <subscript>cond</subscript> method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P <subscript>cond</subscript> method was compared with the standard low-flow method.<br />Measurements and Main Results: Bench assessments validated the P <subscript>cond</subscript> method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P <subscript>cond</subscript> method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P <subscript>cond</subscript> and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO <subscript>2</subscript> were significantly lower during P <subscript>cond</subscript> than during standard method (p < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: Determination of P <subscript>cond</subscript> during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1466-609X
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37420282
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0