Back to Search Start Over

Deep learning based automated delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumour volume in PSMA-PET for patients with primary prostate cancer.

Authors :
Holzschuh JC
Mix M
Ruf J
Hölscher T
Kotzerke J
Vrachimis A
Doolan P
Ilhan H
Marinescu IM
Spohn SKB
Fechter T
Kuhn D
Bronsert P
Gratzke C
Grosu R
Kamran SC
Heidari P
Ng TSC
Könik A
Grosu AL
Zamboglou C
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2023 Nov; Vol. 188, pp. 109774. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 30.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: With the increased use of focal radiation dose escalation for primary prostate cancer (PCa), accurate delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) becomes crucial. Manual approaches are time-consuming and observer dependent. The purpose of this study was to create a deep learning model for the accurate delineation of the intraprostatic GTV in PSMA-PET.<br />Methods: A 3D U-Net was trained on 128 different <superscript>18</superscript> F-PSMA-1007 PET images from three different institutions. Testing was done on 52 patients including one independent internal cohort (Freiburg: n = 19) and three independent external cohorts (Dresden: n = 14 <superscript>18</superscript> F-PSMA-1007, Boston: Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH): n = 9 <superscript>18</superscript> F-DCFPyL-PSMA and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI): n = 10 <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-PSMA-11). Expert contours were generated in consensus using a validated technique. CNN predictions were compared to expert contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Co-registered whole-mount histology was used for the internal testing cohort to assess sensitivity/specificity.<br />Results: Median DSCs were Freiburg: 0.82 (IQR: 0.73-0.88), Dresden: 0.71 (IQR: 0.53-0.75), MGH: 0.80 (IQR: 0.64-0.83) and DFCI: 0.80 (IQR: 0.67-0.84), respectively. Median sensitivity for CNN and expert contours were 0.88 (IQR: 0.68-0.97) and 0.85 (IQR: 0.75-0.88) (p = 0.40), respectively. GTV volumes did not differ significantly (p > 0.1 for all comparisons). Median specificity of 0.83 (IQR: 0.57-0.97) and 0.88 (IQR: 0.69-0.98) were observed for CNN and expert contours (p = 0.014), respectively. CNN prediction took 3.81 seconds on average per patient.<br />Conclusion: The CNN was trained and tested on internal and external datasets as well as histopathology reference, achieving a fast GTV segmentation for three PSMA-PET tracers with high diagnostic accuracy comparable to manual experts.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
188
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37394103
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109774