Platelet-rich Fibrin versus Platelet-rich Plasma: A Study to Assess Efficacy as a Regenerative Medicine Strategy for Chronic Cutaneous Ulcers.

Background: The management of nonhealing ulcers has been a major challenge clinically. Current therapies include debridement, offloading, etc., which show a poor response. Newer modalities include stem cells, platelet-derived growth factors, and fibrin glues, which reduce healing time. Platelets play a major role in wound healing through the secretion of growth factors, chemokines, etc. and have been an area of interest as a modality in regenerative medicine.
Aims and Objective: The aim was to study the comparative efficacy of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a regenerative medicine strategy for chronic cutaneous ulcers.
Materials and Methods: Forty-four ulcers of duration greater than six weeks were enrolled for a comparative study comprising two groups, each divided either into group A receiving PRF dressings or group B receiving PRP dressing for six weeks. The ulcer evaluation was performed at baseline, each weekly dressing, and a two-week follow-up.
Results: Primary efficacy was assessed by the percentage reduction in the volume of ulcers and re-epithelization at eight weeks. In total, 95.2% of ulcers in group A and 90.4% of ulcers in group B showed complete re-epithelization. One ulcer in group A and two ulcers in group B developed an infection. The recurrence of the ulcer was seen in four ulcers in the PRF group and three ulcers in the PRP group.
Conclusion: Dressings done with PRF and PRP showed similar efficacy in the percentage reduction in the volume and re-epithelization of chronic cutaneous ulcers. Both dressings were associated with similar complications. PRF and PRP dressings provide a safe, efficacious, and inexpensive regenerative medicine strategy in the healing of chronic cutaneous ulcers.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery.)