Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of partial pressure CO 2 change in the dialyzer blood inlet during hemodialysis as a measure of vascular access recirculation.

Authors :
Rotondi S
Perrotta A
Pintus G
Capasso L
Pasquali M
Farcomeni A
Paoloni E
Mazzaferro S
Tartaglione L
Source :
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis [Hemodial Int] 2023 Oct; Vol. 27 (4), pp. 370-377. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 28.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Vascular access recirculation during hemodialysis is associated with reduced effectiveness and worse survival outcomes. To evaluate recirculation, an increase in pCO <subscript>2</subscript> in the blood of the arterial line during hemodialysis (threshold of 4.5 mmHg) was proposed. The blood returning from the dialyzer in the venous line has significantly higher pCO <subscript>2</subscript> , so in the presence of recirculation, pCO2 in the arterial blood line may increase (ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> ) during hemodialysis sessions. The aim of our study was to evaluate ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> as a diagnostic tool for vascular access recirculation in chronic hemodialysis patients.<br />Methods: We evaluated vascular access recirculation with ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> and compared it with the results of a urea recirculation test, which is the gold standard. ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> was obtained from the difference in pCO <subscript>2</subscript> in the arterial line at baseline (pCO <subscript>2</subscript> T1) and after 5 min of hemodialysis (pCO <subscript>2</subscript> T2). ∆pCO <subscript>2</subscript>  = pCO <subscript>2</subscript> T2-pCO <subscript>2</subscript> T1.<br />Findings: In 70 hemodialysis patients (mean age: 70.52 ± 13.97 years; hemodialysis vintage of 41.36 ± 34.54, KT/V 1.4 ± 0.3), ∆pCO <subscript>2</subscript> was 4 ± 4 mmHg, and urea recirculation was 7% ± 9%. Vascular access recirculation was identified using both methods in 17 of 70 patients, who showed a ∆pCO <subscript>2</subscript> of 10 ± 5 mmHg and urea recirculation of 20% ± 9%; time in months of hemodialysis was the only difference between vascular access recirculation and non-vascular access recirculation patients (22 ± 19 vs. 46 ± 36, p: 0.05). In the non-vascular access recirculation group, the average ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> was 1.9 ± 2 (p: 0.001), and the urea recirculation % was 2.8 ± 3 (p: 0.001). The ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> correlated with the urea recirculation % (R: 0.728; p < 0.001).<br />Discussion: ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> in the arterial blood line during hemodialysis is an effective and reliable diagnostic tool for identifying recirculation of the vascular access but not its magnitude. The ΔpCO <subscript>2</subscript> test application is simple and economical and does not require special equipment.<br /> (© 2023 The Authors. Hemodialysis International published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1542-4758
Volume :
27
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37380376
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13109