Back to Search Start Over

Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors :
Signorelli C
Calegari MA
Basso M
Anghelone A
Lucchetti J
Minelli A
Angotti L
Zurlo IV
Schirripa M
Chilelli MG
Morelli C
Dell'Aquila E
Cosimati A
Gemma D
Ribelli M
Emiliani A
Corsi DC
Arrivi G
Mazzuca F
Zoratto F
Morandi MG
Santamaria F
Saltarelli R
Ruggeri EM
Source :
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) [Curr Oncol] 2023 Jun 04; Vol. 30 (6), pp. 5456-5469. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 04.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice.<br />Materials and Methods: In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes.<br />Results: The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) ( p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T ( p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) ( p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) ( p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies.<br />Conclusions: The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1718-7729
Volume :
30
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37366896
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30060413