Back to Search Start Over

Building a Roadmap for Surveillance of Renal Masses Using a Modified Delphi Method to Help Achieve Consensus.

Authors :
Patel AK
Butaney M
Lane BR
Wilder S
Johnson A
Qi J
Wang Y
DiBianco J
Herrel L
Maatman T
Peabody J
Rosenberg B
Seifman B
Semerjian A
Shetty S
Schervish E
Collins J
Tandogdu Z
Rogers CG
Source :
Urology [Urology] 2023 Oct; Vol. 180, pp. 168-175. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 21.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: To establish a consensus for initial evaluation and follow-up of patients on active surveillance (AS) for T1 renal masses (T1RM).<br />Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to gather information about AS of T1RM, with a focus on patient selection, timing/type of imaging modality, and triggers for intervention. A consensus panel of Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative-affiliated urologists who routinely manage renal masses was formed. Areas of consensus (defined >80% agreement) about T1RM AS were established iteratively via 3 rounds of online questionnaires.<br />Results: Twenty-six Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative urologists formed the panel. Consensus was achieved for 321/587 scenarios (54.7%) administered through 124 questions. Life expectancy, age, comorbidity, and renal function were most important for patient selection, with life expectancy ranking first. All tumors <3 cm and all patients with life expectancy <1 year were considered appropriate for AS. Appropriateness also increased with elevated perioperative risk, increasing tumor complexity, and/or declining renal function. Consensus was for multiphasic axial imaging initially (contrast CT for GFR >60 or MRI for GFR >30) with first repeat imaging at 3-6 months and subsequent imaging timing determined by tumor size. Consensus was for chest imaging for tumors >3 cm initially and >5 cm at follow up. Renal biopsy was not felt to be a requirement for entering AS, but useful in several scenarios. Consensus indicated rapid tumor growth as an appropriate trigger for intervention.<br />Conclusion: Our consensus panel was able to achieve areas of consensus to help define a clinically useful and specific roadmap for AS of T1RM and areas for further discussion where consensus was not achieved.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-9995
Volume :
180
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37353086
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.010