Back to Search
Start Over
Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through-the-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Source :
-
Journal of gastrointestinal cancer [J Gastrointest Cancer] 2024 Mar; Vol. 55 (1), pp. 15-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jun 21. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) has been used over the past few years to increase diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). However, many concerns remain regarding its widespread use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the data from high-quality studies to evaluate the utility of EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs.<br />Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from January 2010 through October 2022 were searched for publications addressing the diagnostic performance of EUS-TTNB in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models.<br />Results: The initial search identified 635 studies, of which 35 relevant articles were reviewed. We extracted data from 11 studies that met the inclusion criterion, comprising a total of 575 patients. Mean patient age was 62.25 years ± 6.12 with females constituting 61.39% of the study population. Pooled sensitivity of EUS-TTNB in differentiating a PCL as neoplastic or non-neoplastic was 76.60% (95% CI = 72.60-80. 30). For the same indication, EUS TTNB had a pooled specificity of 98.90% (95% CI = 93.80-100.00). The positive likelihood ratio was 10.28 (95% CI = 4.77-22.15), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI = 0.22-0.31). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs as malignant/pre-malignant vs. non-malignant was 41.34 (95% CI = 17.42-98.08). Pooled adverse event rates were 3.04% (95% CI = 1.83-4.54) for pancreatitis, 4.02% (95% CI = 2.61-5.72) for intra-cystic bleeding, 0.94% (95% CI = 0.33-1.86) for fever, and 1.73% (95% CI = 0.85-2.91) for other minor events.<br />Conclusions: EUS-TTNB has good sensitivity with excellent specificity in accurately classifying PCLs as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Adding EUS-TTNB to EUS-FNA increases the accuracy of EUS-guided approach in diagnosing PCLs. However, it could significantly increase the risk of post-procedural pancreatitis.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Subjects :
- Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration methods
Pancreatic Cyst pathology
Pancreatic Cyst diagnostic imaging
Pancreatic Cyst diagnosis
Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology
Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnosis
Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941-6636
- Volume :
- 55
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37341913
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-023-00949-w