Evaluation of a workplace educational intervention on menopause: A quasi-experimental study.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a workplace educational intervention on menopause on self-efficacy regarding working during the climacteric.
Methods: Quasi-experimental design, with one intervention and one control group. Women aged 40 to 67, working in one of the two participating departments of a large municipality in the Netherlands, were recruited to participate in the study. The allocation of participants to intervention or control group was done at the departmental level. The main component of the multifaceted intervention consisted of educational workshops on menopause and work. The primary outcome was score on the Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms Scale. Secondary outcomes were scores on other self-efficacy scales, knowledge about the menopausal transition, menopausal symptoms, beliefs and behaviours and work-related variables. Differences between groups were analysed with Pearson's chi-square, Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to correct for baseline and potential confounders.
Results: Data from 54 women were analysed, 25 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group. After 12 weeks of follow-up, the mean score on the Self-Efficacy to Manage Symptoms Scale was higher in the intervention group than in the control group: 6.52 (SD 1.45) versus 5.84 (SD 1.51), respectively, adjusted mean difference 0.75 (95 % CI 0.03-1.46, p = 0.040). The educational intervention increased self-reported knowledge (scored on the range 1-10) (adjusted mean difference 0.7, 95 % CI 0.26-1.15, p = 0.002) and resulted in a lower level of presenteeism (i.e., less impaired work performance) due to menopausal symptoms, measured by the Dutch Stanford Presenteeism Scale (adjusted mean difference 2.15, 95 % CI 0.13-4.18, p = 0.038), compared to the control group.
Conclusions: This educational workplace intervention study shows promising positive effects on self-efficacy regarding working during the climacteric, knowledge about the menopausal transition and presenteeism due to menopausal symptoms. This is especially true for women already experiencing menopausal symptoms, while premenopausal women were harder to engage in the intervention. A larger study, with longer follow-up, preferably a randomized controlled trial, is needed to investigate the clinical relevance of these findings.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Johannes R. Anema is advisor of Amsterdam University Medical Centre's spin-off companies IKherstel BV and holds a chair in Insurance Medicine sponsored by the Dutch Social Security Institute. All other authors declare that they have no competing interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)