Back to Search Start Over

Estimating motor unit numbers from a CMAP scan: Repeatability study on three muscles at 15 centres.

Authors :
Sørensen DM
Bostock H
Abrahao A
Alaamel A
Alaydin HC
Ballegaard M
Boran E
Cengiz B
de Carvalho M
Dunker Ø
Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
Graffe CC
Jones KE
Kallio M
Kalra S
Krarup C
Krøigård T
Liguori R
Lupescu T
Maitland S
Matamala JM
Moldovan M
Moreno-Roco J
Nilsen KB
Phung L
Santos MO
Themistocleous AC
Uysal H
Vacchiano V
Whittaker RG
Zinman L
Tankisi H
Source :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [Clin Neurophysiol] 2023 Jul; Vol. 151, pp. 92-99. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 08.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: To assess the repeatability and suitability for multicentre studies of MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE), which involves modelling compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans.<br />Methods: Fifteen groups in 9 countries recorded CMAP scans twice, 1-2 weeks apart in healthy subjects from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. The original MScanFit program (MScanFit-1) was compared with a revised version (MScanFit-2), designed to accommodate different muscles and recording conditions by setting the minimal motor unit size as a function of maximum CMAP.<br />Results: Complete sets of 6 recordings were obtained from 148 subjects. CMAP amplitudes differed significantly between centres for all muscles, and the same was true for MScanFit-1 MUNE. With MScanFit-2, MUNE differed less between centres but remained significantly different for APB. Coefficients of variation between repeats were 18.0% for ADM, 16.8% for APB, and 12.1% for TA.<br />Conclusions: It is recommended for multicentre studies to use MScanFit-2 for analysis. TA provided the least variable MUNE values between subjects and the most repeatable within subjects.<br />Significance: MScanFit was primarily devised to model the discontinuities in CMAP scans in patients and is less suitable for healthy subjects with smooth scans.<br /> (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-8952
Volume :
151
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37236129
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.008