Back to Search Start Over

Switching from Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin Plus a P2Y12 Inhibitor to Dual Pathway Inhibition with Aspirin Plus Vascular-Dose Rivaroxaban: The Switching Anti-Platelet and Anti-Coagulant Therapy (SWAP-AC) Study.

Authors :
Ortega-Paz L
Franchi F
Rollini F
Galli M
Been L
Ghanem G
Shalhoub A
Ossi T
Rivas A
Zhou X
Pineda AM
Suryadevara S
Soffer D
Zenni MM
Jennings LK
Angiolillo DJ
Source :
Thrombosis and haemostasis [Thromb Haemost] 2024 Mar; Vol. 124 (3), pp. 263-273. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background:  To date, there are no data on switching to dual pathway inhibition (DPI) patients who have completed a guideline-recommended dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen.<br />Objectives:  To assess the feasibility of switching from DAPT to DPI and to compare the pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of these treatments.<br />Methods:  This was a prospective, randomized, PD study conducted in 90 patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) on DAPT with aspirin (81 mg/qd) plus a P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> inhibitor (clopidogrel [75 mg/qd; n  = 30], ticagrelor [90 mg/bid; n  = 30], or prasugrel [10 mg/qd; n  = 30]). Patients in each cohort were randomized to maintain DAPT or switch to DPI (aspirin 81 mg/qd plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg/bid). PD assessments included: VerifyNow P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> reaction units; light transmittance aggregometry following stimuli with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), tissue factor (TF), and a combination of collagen, ADP, and TF (maximum platelet aggregation %); thrombin generation (TG). Assays were performed at baseline and 30 days postrandomization.<br />Results:  Switching from DAPT to DPI occurred without major side effects. DAPT was associated with enhanced P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> inhibition, while DPI with reduced TG. Platelet-mediated global thrombogenicity (primary endpoint) showed no differences between DAPT and DPI in the ticagrelor (14.5% [0.0-63.0] vs. 20.0% [0.0-70.0]; p  = 0.477) and prasugrel (20.0% [0.0-66.0] vs. 4.0% [0.0-70.0]; p  = 0.482), but not clopidogrel (27.0% [0.0-68.0] vs. 53.0% [0.0-81.0]; p  = 0.011), cohorts.<br />Conclusion:  In patients with CCS, switching from different DAPT regimens to DPI was feasible, showing enhanced P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> inhibition with DAPT and reduced TG with DPI, with no differences in platelet-mediated global thrombogenicity between DPI and ticagrelor- and prasugrel-, but not clopidogrel-, based DAPT.<br />Clinical Trial Registration:  http://www.<br />Clinicaltrials: gov Unique Identifier: NCT04006288.<br />Competing Interests: F.F. declares that he has received payment as an individual for consulting fee or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Sanofi; and institutional payments for grants from PLx Pharma and The Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. D.J.A. declares that he has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi and Vectura; D.J.A. also declares that his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Other authors have nothing to declare.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2567-689X
Volume :
124
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37224883
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2098-6639