Asymmetry of radiomics features in the white matter of patients with primary progressive aphasia.

Introduction: Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurological disease characterized by linguistic deficits. Semantic (svPPA) and non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants are the two main clinical subtypes. We applied a novel analytical framework, based on radiomic analysis, to investigate White Matter (WM) asymmetry and to examine whether asymmetry is associated with verbal fluency performance.
Methods: Analyses were performed on T1-weighted images including 56 patients with PPA (31 svPPA and 25 nfvPPA) and 53 age- and sex-matched controls. Asymmetry Index (AI) was computed for 86 radiomics features in 34 white matter regions. The relationships between AI, verbal fluency performance (semantic and phonemic) and Boston Naming Test score (BNT) were explored through Spearman correlation analysis.
Results: Relative to controls, WM asymmetry in svPPA patients involved regions adjacent to middle temporal cortex as part of the inferior longitudinal (ILF), fronto-occipital (IFOF) and superior longitudinal fasciculi. Conversely, nfvPPA patients showed an asymmetry of WM in lateral occipital regions (ILF/IFOF). A higher lateralization involving IFOF, cingulum and forceps minor was found in nfvPPA compared to svPPA patients. In nfvPPA patients, semantic fluency was positively correlated to asymmetry in ILF/IFOF tracts. Performances at BNT were associated with AI values of the middle temporal (ILF/SLF) and parahippocampal (ILF/IFOF) gyri in svPPA patients.
Discussion: Radiomics features depicted distinct pathways of asymmetry in svPPA and nfvPPA involving damage of principal fiber tracts associated with speech and language. Assessing asymmetry of radiomics in PPA allows achieving a deeper insight into the neuroanatomical damage and may represent a candidate severity marker for language impairments in PPA patients.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2023 Tafuri, Filardi, Urso, Gnoni, De Blasi, Nigro, Logroscino.)