Back to Search
Start Over
Unsatisfactory reproducibility of interstitial inflammation scoring in allograft kidney biopsy.
- Source :
-
Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 May 01; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 7095. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 May 01. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Interstitial inflammation scoring is incorporated into the Banff Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology and is essential for the diagnosis of T-cell mediated rejection. However, its reproducibility, including inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities, has not been carefully investigated. In this study, eight renal pathologists from different hospitals independently scored 45 kidney allograft biopsies with varying extents of interstitial inflammation. Inter-rater reliabilities and intra-rater reliabilities were investigated by kappa statistics and conditional agreement probabilities. Individual pathologists' scoring patterns were examined by chi-squared tests and proportions tests. The mean pairwise kappa values for inter-rater reliability were 0.27, 0.30, and 0.26 for the Banff i score, ti score, and i-IFTA, respectively. No rater pair performed consistently better or worse than others on all three scorings. After dichotomizing the scores into two groups (none/mild and moderate/severe inflammation), the averaged conditional agreements ranged from 47.1% to 50.0%. The distributions of the scores differed, but some pathologists persistently scored higher or lower than others. Given the important role of interstitial inflammation scoring in the diagnosis of T-cell mediated rejection, transplant practitioners should be aware of the possible clinical implications of the far-from-optimal reproducibility.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2045-2322
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Scientific reports
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 37127772
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33908-3