Back to Search Start Over

Proteomic analysis of tears in dry eye disease: A prospective, double-blind multicenter study.

Authors :
Jung GT
Kim M
Song JS
Kim TI
Chung TY
Choi CY
Kim HS
An WJ
Jeong SJ
Lee HS
Jeon S
Kim KP
Lee HK
Source :
The ocular surface [Ocul Surf] 2023 Jul; Vol. 29, pp. 68-76. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 23.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To identify specific dry eye disease (DED) tear biomarker(s) using tear proteomic analysis, clinical parameters, and their correlations before and after DED treatment.<br />Methods: A prospective, double-blinded, national multicenter clinical study was performed using data from 80 DED patients. The patients were treated with 0.1% cyclosporine (CsA, n = 28), 0.05% CsA (n = 26), or 3% diquafosol (DQS, n = 26) eye drops, and tear proteome changes and clinical outcomes (tear break-up time [TBUT], corneal erosion [Cor-Er], conjunctival erosion [Conj-Er], and symptom assessment in dry eye [SANDE] scores) were observed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. For all clinical parameters, correlation analysis was performed between the three drug conditions and the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) from the proteomic analysis.<br />Results: AFM, ALCAM, CFB, H1-4, PON1, RAP1B, and RBP4 were identified in all treatment groups and were downregulated after treatment. All clinical parameters significantly improved at 12 weeks than at baseline (p-value <0.0001); however, their values were not significantly different among groups, except for Cor-Er (p-value = 0.007). Compared with the DQS group, Cor-Er score significantly improved after treatment with 0.1% and 0.05% CsA. The seven DEPs identified in all groups were not consistently correlated with the clinical parameters (p-value >0.05).<br />Conclusions: Despite differences in drug concentration and action mechanisms, the improvement levels of TBUT, Cor-Er, and SANDE scores were clinically adequate. However, useful tear protein biomarkers, clinically acceptable biomarker combinations correlating with clinical parameters, and clinically acceptable levels of specificity and sensitivity were not identified.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1937-5913
Volume :
29
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The ocular surface
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37094778
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.015