Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of renal clearance of [ 18 F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH and [ 18 F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH in mice and breast cancer patients.

Authors :
Liu J
Guo X
Wen L
Wang L
Liu F
Song G
Zhu H
Zhou N
Yang Z
Source :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging [Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging] 2023 Jul; Vol. 50 (9), pp. 2775-2786. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 24.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: A novel HER2 affibody-based molecular probe, [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH, was developed for reducing renal uptake, evaluated, and compared with [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH.<br />Methods: In preclinical studies, micro-PET/CT was performed using HER2-positive gastric cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDX) model at 0.5-1 (dynamic), 2, 4, and 6 h post-injection. For blocking experiment, 0.5 mg cold affibody was co-injected with probes. Biodistribution were performed on HER2-positive PDX models at 2 h post-injection. For clinical study, PET/CT images were acquired at 2 h and 4 h after injection of 231.29 ± 17.77 MBq [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH or [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH in five breast cancer patients (4 HER2-positive and 1 HER2-low). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were measured in tumors and source-organs for semi-quantitative analysis. The OLINDA/EXM software (version 1.2) was used to calculate the radiation doses.<br />Results: [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH and [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH were stably labeled with [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]F, with high binding specificity and affinity to HER2. Micro-PET/CT of both tracers could clearly visualize HER2-positive PDX tumors with high uptake of 16.24 ± 1.74% ID/g and 14.39 ± 2.45% ID/g at 2 h post-injection. The renal accumulation of [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH was significantly lower than that of [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH (5.16 ± 0.22% ID/g vs. 158.73 ± 5.44% ID/g at 2 h, p < 0.0001). In the clinical study, both [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH and [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH demonstrated favorable tumor targeting and image contrast. [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH showed a higher SUVmax in both primary tumor and metastases, and a significantly higher target-to-nontarget ratio in metastases than [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH. Moreover, [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH had lower renal accumulation (43.56 ± 7.88 vs. 79.81 ± 3.81 at 2 h, p < 0.0001; 33.23 ± 6.89 vs. 78.63 ± 4.00 at 4 h, p < 0.0001) as well as a significantly lower renal absorbed dose than [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH (0.4450 ± 0.1117 mGy/MBq vs. 0.8030 ± 0.1604 mGy/MBq, p < 0.01).<br />Conclusions: [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH tended to provide better image contrast than [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH with a higher target-to-nontarget ratio in detection of metastases. Notably, [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-RESCA-HER2-BCH had lower renal accumulation than [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]AlF-NOTA-HER2-BCH.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1619-7089
Volume :
50
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37093312
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06232-1