[Epicondylosis : Open surgical procedure-when and how for lateral and medial epicondylitis?]

Background: Epicondylosis of the elbow are common pathologies, with a higher incidence for radial epicondylosis. Approximately 90% are self-limiting under conservative treatment.
Treatment: Multiple surgical procedures exist for the treatment of refractory cases. Arthroscopic treatment has been described for both radial and medial pathologies. Open and arthroscopic procedures show equivalent results in the surgical treatment of radial epicondylosis. This paper describes the most common open surgical procedures for the treatment of radial epicondylosis. Furthermore, the pros and cons of the arthroscopic versus the open approach are discussed, and the indications for an open surgical procedure for radial pathologies are highlighted. The authors believe that the open technique represents the standard treatment in the surgical treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.
Limitations: Arthroscopic procedures have been described, but studies comparing the clinical outcome versus open surgical treatment are lacking. The anatomic proximity of the flexor origin to the ulnar nerve with the risk of iatrogenic damage is another limiting factor. In addition, concomitant pathologies on the ulnar side can better be ruled out preoperatively, so that arthroscopy has a rather low significance in the treatment of ulnar epicondylosis.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)