Back to Search Start Over

The Influence of Surgical Timing on Clinical Outcomes in Primary Extramacular Retinal Detachment in a Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors :
Yannuzzi NA
Brown K
Callaway NF
Patel NA
Albini TA
Berrocal AM
Davis JL
Gregori NN
Fortun J
Haddock LJ
Lee WH
Schwartz SG
Sridhar J
Smiddy WE
Flynn HW Jr
Townsend J
Source :
Journal of vitreoretinal diseases [J Vitreoretin Dis] 2019 Dec 20; Vol. 4 (2), pp. 91-95. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 20 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: This article reports the influence of timing on the clinical outcomes in primary extramacular rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) at a tertiary referral center.<br />Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted of all patients presenting between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016, with primary extramacular RRD. Retinal detachments with grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy, combined tractional and RRD, eyes with inflammatory disease, and prior retinal surgery were excluded. The main outcome measures were single-operation anatomic success (SOAS), final anatomic success, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).<br />Results: There were 202 eyes of 198 patients with an average of 22 months' follow-up (range, 6-47 months). Eyes were operated on an average of 1.1 days after initial presentation. At last clinical examination, SOAS had been achieved in 174 (86%) eyes, final anatomic success in 200 (99%) eyes, and average postoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA was 0.18 (Snellen equivalent, 20/30; SD, 0.36). In those treated the day of presentation, average postoperative logMAR BCVA was 0.18 (Snellen, 20/31) in comparison to 0.18 (Snellen, 20/30) in those treated the day after presentation and 0.14 (Snellen, 20/28) in those treated after 2 days or more ( P = .92).<br />Conclusions: Regarding timing of surgery, SOAS and BCVA outcomes in primary extramacular RRDs were favorable with an urgent and semiurgent approach to repair. There was no difference in visual and anatomic outcomes between patients who were operated on the day of presentation and those treated a short time later when clinical decisions were made by the treating surgeon on a case-by-case basis.<br />Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2019.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2474-1272
Volume :
4
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of vitreoretinal diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37008372
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2474126419893816