Back to Search Start Over

Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors :
Westin JR
Locke FL
Dickinson M
Ghobadi A
Elsawy M
van Meerten T
Miklos DB
Ulrickson ML
Perales MA
Farooq U
Wannesson L
Leslie L
Kersten MJ
Jacobson CA
Pagel JM
Wulf G
Johnston P
Rapoport AP
Du L
Vardhanabhuti S
Filosto S
Shah J
Snider JT
Cheng P
To C
Oluwole OO
Sureda A
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research [Clin Cancer Res] 2023 May 15; Vol. 29 (10), pp. 1894-1905.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: Older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may be considered ineligible for curative-intent therapy including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Here, we report outcomes of a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years in ZUMA-7.<br />Patients and Methods: Patients with LBCL refractory to or relapsed ≤12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy] or standard of care (SOC; 2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by HDT-ASCT). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).<br />Results: Fifty-one and 58 patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Median EFS was greater with axi-cel versus SOC (21.5 vs. 2.5 months; median follow-up: 24.3 months; HR, 0.276; descriptive P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was higher with axi-cel versus SOC (88% vs. 52%; OR, 8.81; descriptive P < 0.0001; complete response rate: 75% vs. 33%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 94% of axi-cel and 82% of SOC patients. No grade 5 cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred. In the quality-of-life analysis, the mean change in PRO scores from baseline at days 100 and 150 favored axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (descriptive P < 0.05). CAR T-cell expansion and baseline serum inflammatory profile were comparable in patients ≥65 and <65 years.<br />Conclusions: Axi-cel is an effective second-line curative-intent therapy with a manageable safety profile and improved PROs for patients ≥65 years with R/R LBCL.<br /> (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-3265
Volume :
29
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36999993
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3136