Back to Search Start Over

Approaches to quantify the contribution of multiple anemia risk factors in children and women from cross-sectional national surveys.

Authors :
Ko YA
Williams AM
Peerson JM
Luo H
Flores-Ayala R
Wirth JP
Engle-Stone R
Young MF
Suchdev PS
Source :
PLOS global public health [PLOS Glob Public Health] 2022 Oct 13; Vol. 2 (10), pp. e0001071. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 13 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Attributable fractions (AF) of anemia are often used to understand the multifactorial etiologies of anemia, despite challenges interpreting them in cross-sectional studies. We aimed to compare different statistical approaches for estimating AF for anemia due to inflammation, malaria, and micronutrient deficiencies including iron, vitamin A, vitamin B12, and folate.<br />Methods: AF were calculated using nationally representative survey data among preschool children (10 countries, total N = 7,973) and nonpregnant women of reproductive age (11 countries, total N = 15,141) from the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutrition Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) project. We used the following strategies to calculate AF: 1) Levin's formula with prevalence ratio (PR) in place of relative risk (RR), 2) Levin's formula with odds ratio (OR) in place of RR, and 3) average (sequential) AF considering all possible removal sequences of risk factors. PR was obtained by 1) modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, 2) Kleinman-Norton's approach, and 3) estimation from OR using Zhang-Yu's approach. Survey weighted country-specific analysis was performed with and without adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and other risk factors.<br />Results: About 20-70% of children and 20-50% of women suffered from anemia, depending on the survey. Using OR yielded the highest and potentially biased AF, in some cases double those using PR. Adjusted AF using different PR estimations (Poisson regression, Kleinman-Norton, Zhang-Yu) were nearly identical. Average AF estimates were similar to those using Levin's formula with PR. Estimated anemia AF for children and women were 2-36% and 3-46% for iron deficiency, <24% and <12% for inflammation, and 2-36% and 1-16% for malaria. Unadjusted AF substantially differed from adjusted AF in most countries.<br />Conclusion: AF of anemia can be estimated from survey data using Levin's formula or average AF. While different approaches exist to estimate adjusted PR, Poisson regression is likely the easiest to implement. AF are a useful metric to prioritize interventions to reduce anemia prevalence, and the similarity across methods provides researchers flexibility in selecting AF approaches.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following competing interests: JPW is an employee of GroundWork LLC. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.<br /> (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2767-3375
Volume :
2
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PLOS global public health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36962596
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001071