Back to Search
Start Over
Randomized controlled trial of intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia for esophageal dilation with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in esophageal cancer patients.
- Source :
-
Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2023 Jul; Vol. 37 (7), pp. 5109-5113. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 16. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is mostly diagnosed in its later stages, when patients present with dysphagia and weight loss. Esophageal dilation with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a common surgical procedure in patients with locally advanced ESCC because of tumor obstruction and enteral nutrition support during neoadjuvant or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Esophageal dilation with PEG is widely performed under general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation.<br />Aim of the Study: To determine the overall success rate of completing this procedure using intravenous (IV) sedation with dexmedetomidine (DEX) relative to GA and to compare its perioperative conditions, including procedure times, pain scores (visual analog scale), adverse events, and costs.<br />Settings: Songklanagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.<br />Patients and Methods: Prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of locally advanced ESCC patients who had dysphagia and needed esophageal dilation with PEG between January 2020 and December 2021. Esophageal dilation (using a Savary-Gilliard dilator) and PEG were performed using the pull technique.<br />Results: Seventy patients were randomly assigned to either the DEX group (nā=ā34) or the GA group (nā=ā36). All patients in both groups underwent successful surgery. The DEX group had a significantly shorter procedure time, lower procedure cost, and lower total hospital cost than the GA group. However, there were no significant between-group differences in pain scores or length of hospital stay. There were no serious adverse events in either group; however, the GA group had some incidences of sore throat, transient hoarseness, and atelectasis.<br />Conclusion: This study found that IV sedation with DEX during esophageal dilation with PEG was as effective and safe as using GA.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1432-2218
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Surgical endoscopy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36928761
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09984-x