Back to Search Start Over

Utility of En Face OCT for the Detection of Clinically Unsuspected Retinal Neovascularization in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors :
Tsuboi K
Mazloumi M
Guo Y
Wang J
Flaxel CJ
Bailey ST
Huang D
Jia Y
Hwang TS
Source :
Ophthalmology. Retina [Ophthalmol Retina] 2023 Aug; Vol. 7 (8), pp. 683-691. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 12.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the value of en face OCT for detecting clinically unsuspected retinal neovascularization (RNV) in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).<br />Design: A retrospective, cross-sectional study.<br />Participants: Treatment-naïve patients clinically graded as NPDR in an ongoing prospective observational OCT angiography (OCTA) study at a tertiary care center.<br />Methods: Each patient underwent imaging of 1 eye with a spectral-domain OCTA, generating a 17 × 17-mm widefield image by montaging four 9 × 9-mm scans. Two independent graders examined a combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA with a custom vitreoretinal interface slab, and cross-sectional OCTA to determine the presence of RNV. We measured the area of RNV flow within RNV lesions on en face OCTA.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Detection rate of clinically occult RNV with OCT and OCTA.<br />Results: Of 63 enrolled eyes, 27 (43%) were clinically graded as severe NPDR, 16 (25%) as moderate NPDR, and 20 (32%) as mild NPDR. Using the combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA, and cross-sectional OCTA, the graders detected 42 RNV lesions in 12 (19%) eyes, of which 8 (67%) were graded as severe NPDR, 2 (17%) as moderate NPDR, and 2 (17%) as mild NPDR. The sensitivity of en face OCT alone for detecting eyes with RNV was similar to that of en face OCTA alone (100% vs. 92%; P = 0.32), whereas the specificity of en face OCT alone was significantly lower than that of en face OCTA alone (32% vs. 73%; P < 0.001). For detecting individual RNV lesions, the en face OCT was 100% sensitive, compared with 67% sensitivity for the en face OCTA (P < 0.001). The area of RNV lesions that manual grading with en face OCTA alone missed was significantly smaller than that of manually detectable RNV (Mean [standard deviation] RNV flow area, 0.015 [0.020] mm <superscript>2</superscript> vs. 0.16 [0.36] mm <superscript>2</superscript> ; P < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: The combination of en face OCT and OCTA can detect clinically occult RNV with high sensitivity. For screening these small lesions, en face OCT may be a useful imaging modality.<br />Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2468-6530
Volume :
7
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ophthalmology. Retina
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36918122
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2023.03.002