Diagnosis and treatment of postoperative bleeding in patients after gastrectomy: a retrospective case series study.

Background: There are significant differences in terms of the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations between intra- and extra-luminal bleeding, and it is also difficult to determine the reasonable management of the bleeding. This study is to analyze the clinical characteristics of postoperative bleeding in gastric cancer, and to explore the management of postoperative intra-intestinal and extra-intestinal bleeding.
Methods: We collected the clinical data of 2,978 patients with gastric cancer from the Department of Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital, from May 2014 to September 2019. A total gastrectomy or a distal or proximal subtotal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection (D1+ or D2) was included. The clinic data and management of both early (postoperative days ≤6 d) and delayed (postoperative days ≥7 d) post-operative hemorrhage were explored. This retrospective study is to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment of intra-intestinal and extra-intestinal hemorrhage.
Results: The incidence of postoperative bleeding in gastric cancer was 2.85% (n=85), and the bleeding-related mortality was 4.7% (4/85). There were 67 men and 18 women, and four patients died, with a bleeding-related mortality rate of 4.7%. There were 46 cases of intra-intestinal hemorrhage and 39 cases of extra-intestinal hemorrhage. The reoperation rate in the extraneous bleeding group was higher than that in the intra-intestinal bleeding group (66.67% vs. 19.57%, P<0.001), and the incidence of delayed bleeding in the extra-intestinal bleeding group was higher than that in the intra-intestinal bleeding group (46.15% vs. 8.70%, P<0.001). In the delayed phase, 11 patients underwent reoperation to stop the bleeding, and three patients died due to bleeding-related complications. Hemostasis was successfully achieved in four patients by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). In the reoperation group, 72.73% (8/11) suffered hemodynamic instability and 63.64% (7/11) had an abdominal infection, while in the TAE group, 25% (1/4) had hemodynamic instability and 50% (2/4) had an abdominal infection.
Conclusions: A greater number of gastric cancer patients with intra-intestinal hemorrhage are treated conservatively, while more patients with extra-intestinal hemorrhage are treated by reoperation. External bleeding is more likely to occur in the delayed period of bleeding. TAE is a safe and effective means of hemostasis if the hemodynamics is stable.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-22-1203/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)