Ethnic disparities in ambient air and traffic-related pollution exposure and ethnic-specific impacts on clinical biomarker levels.

Background: Although characterizing the inequality in pollution exposure burden across ethnic groups and the ethnic-specific exposure associations is of great social and public health importance, it has not been systematically investigated in large population studies.
Methods: The UK Biobank data (N = 485, 806) of individual-level air ambient and traffic-related pollution exposure, biomarkers routinely used in clinical practice, genotype, life-style factors, and socioeconomic status were analyzed. Air pollution exposure estimates were compared among six genetically inferred ethnic groups. We also quantified the association between exposure and biomarkers within and across ethnicities.
Results: Non-European participants (defined by genetics) disproportionately bear a higher burden of exposure than their European counterparts even after adjusting for covariables including socioeconomic status. For example, exposure to NO ₂ in people with African ancestry was 30.7 % higher (p = 1.5E-786) than European subjects. Within the genetically defined African group, larger African genetic ancestry proportion (AGAP) was linked to higher ambient air pollutant exposure. Trans-Ethnic analysis identified 32 clinical biomarkers associated with environmental exposure. For 13 biomarkers, the association with exposure was significantly different or even in opposing directions across ethnic groups.
Conclusions: Substantial disparities in air pollution exposure was observed among genetically-defined ethnic groups. Most importantly, we show that the impact of exposure on biomarkers varies by ethnicity. Reducing the disproportionally high exposure burden on non-European populations and alleviating the adverse consequences in an ethnic-specific manner are of great urgency and significance.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)