Back to Search Start Over

Multi-reader evaluation of different image quality scoring systems in prostate MRI.

Authors :
Hötker AM
Njoh S
Hofer LJ
Held U
Rupp NJ
Ghafoor S
Stocker D
Eberli D
Donati OF
Source :
European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2023 Apr; Vol. 161, pp. 110733. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 09.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate different image quality scoring systems in the assessment of factors limiting diagnostic accuracy of prostate MRI.<br />Methods: This retrospective IRB-approved study included 281 patients undergoing prostate MRI prior to biopsy. Four readers (2 experienced, 2 novice) independently reviewed all MRI examinations (n = 295) and assigned scores for subjective image quality (1-5; 1:poor, 5:excellent), the PI-QUAL and the PSHS scoring system. The original PI-RADS scores were extracted from the report and transperineal template saturation biopsy served as histopathological reference.<br />Results: Inter-reader agreement was found to be good, with PSHS showing highest agreement (kappa: 0.65). The PSHS scoring system performed well assessing the influence of image quality on sensitivity of MR for clinically-significant cancer for the experienced readers using a PI-RADS score cut-off ≥ 3/≥4, as did the PI-QUAL scoring system with a PI-RADS cut-off ≥ 4. For the less experienced radiologist, this was true for PSHS (clinically-significant and all cancers) and PI-QUAL scores (clinically-significant cancers) for a PI-RADS score ≥ 3. PSHS scores were positively associated with the detection of clinically-significant cancer based on a PI-RADS cut-off ≥ 4, OR 1.86 (95 % CI 1.22-2.82), and had the highest Somers' D.<br />Conclusions: The PSHS scoring system performed well in assessing the effect of image quality on detection rates, as did the PI-QUAL system. Since both systems focus on different aspects of image quality, their incorporation into prostate MRI reports could further enhance standardization and allow for a reliable assessment of image quality as a potential confounder in prostate MRI.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-7727
Volume :
161
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36780738
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110733