Back to Search
Start Over
Mucolytics for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society [Eur Respir Rev] 2023 Jan 25; Vol. 32 (167). Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 25 (Print Publication: 2023). - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- This meta-analysis explored the safety and effectiveness of mucolytics as an add-on treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Based on a pre-registered protocol and following Cochrane methods, we systematically searched for relevant randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Risk of Bias v2 tool for appraising the studies and performed random-effect meta-analyses when appropriate. We assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE. This meta-analysis included 24 RCTs involving 2192 patients with COPD exacerbations, entailing at least some concerns of methodological bias. We demonstrated with moderate certainty that mucolytics increase the rate of treatment success (relative risk 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.73, n=383), while they also exert benefits on overall symptom scores (standardised mean difference 0.86, 95% CI 0.63-1.09, n=316), presence of cough at follow-up (relative risk 1.93, 95% CI 1.15-3.23) and ease of expectoration (relative risk 2.94, 95% CI 1.68-5.12). Furthermore, low or very low certainty evidence suggests mucolytics may also reduce future risk of exacerbations and improve health-related quality of life, but do not impact on breathlessness, length of hospital stay, indication for higher level of care or serious adverse events. Overall, mucolytics could be considered for COPD exacerbation management. These findings should be validated in further, rigorous RCTs.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work. E. Papadopoulou, J. Hansel, and Z. Lazar report no conflict of interest. K. Kostikas reports grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Innovis, ELPEN, GSK, Menarini, Novartis and NuvoAir, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, ELPEN, GSK, Menarini, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme, honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, ELPEN, GILEAD, GSK, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and WebMD. S. Tryfon reports honoraria from Menarini, Boehringer-Ingelheim and ELPEN, support for attending meetings from Chiesi and Menarini, and patents with GSK, AstraZeneca and ELPEN, not related to this work. J. Vestbo reports consulting fees and/or honoraria from ALK-Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and TEVA, not related to this work. A.G. Mathioudakis reports a research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim, not related to this work.<br /> (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1600-0617
- Volume :
- 32
- Issue :
- 167
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36697209
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0141-2022