Back to Search Start Over

Network meta-analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors :
Tokavanich N
Prasitlumkum N
Kewcharoen J
Chokesuwattanaskul R
Phannajit J
Cheungpasitporn W
Akoum N
Ranjan R
Bunch TJ
Navaravong L
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol] 2023 Apr; Vol. 34 (4), pp. 869-879. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 29.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with a power of 40-50 W was proved to be safe and effective. Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) AF ablation is a novel method using >50 W to obtain more durable AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation compared with HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation.<br />Methods: A literature search for studies that reported AF ablation outcomes, including short-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia, first-pass isolation (FPI) rate, procedure time, and major complications, was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant studies were included in this analysis. A random-effects model of network meta-analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to rank the treatment for all outcomes.<br />Results: A total of 29 studies with 9721 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA analysis, HPSD ablation had the highest probability of maintaining sinus rhythm. Point estimation showed an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9) between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation and an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.78-2.2) between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. While the odds ratio of FPI between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.5-8.9), the odds ratio between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 2.2 (95% CI: 0.61-8.6). The procedure times of vHPSD and HPSD ablations were comparable and, therefore, shorter than that of conventional power ablation. Major complications were low in all techniques.<br />Conclusion: vHPSD ablation did not yield higher efficacy than HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. With the safety concern, vHPSD ablation outcomes were comparable with those of other techniques.<br /> (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1540-8167
Volume :
34
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36691892
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15831