Back to Search Start Over

Low-volume grade group 2 prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance: a radical prostatectomy retrospective analysis.

Authors :
Björklund J
Cheung DC
Martin LJ
Komisarenko M
Lajkosz K
Hamilton RJ
Zlotta AR
Finelli A
Source :
Scandinavian journal of urology [Scand J Urol] 2023 Feb-Dec; Vol. 57 (1-6), pp. 29-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 23.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: Guidelines support considering selected men with ISUP grade group (GG) 2 prostate cancer for active surveillance (AS). We assessed the association of clinical variables with unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy in low-volume GG 2 prostate cancer on biopsy in a retrospective cohort.<br />Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 378 men with low-volume (≤ 2 cores) GG 2 localized prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy at a single tertiary cancer center. Multivariable logistic regression of unfavorable pathology, upgrading to ≥ T3, or GG ≥ 3 was performed in relation to clinical factors, common variables used in AS in GG 1 and percentage Gleason 4 at biopsy. We compared the performance of potential variables with commonly used combined AS restrictions in GG 1 prostate cancer.<br />Results: In total, 128/378 (34%) men had unfavorable pathology at radical prostatectomy. On multivariable analysis, > 5% Gleason pattern 4 was independently associated with an increased risk of GG ≥ 3. A maximum percentage core involvement > 50% was independently associated with an increased risk of pT-stage ≥ 3 and unfavorable pathology. Restriction to patients with ≤ 5% Gleason 4 decreased the upgrading of both unfavorable pathology (OR = 0.62, p  = 0.041) and GG ≥ 3 (OR = 0.17, p  = 0.0007) compared to the full cohort, while restriction to those with ≤ 50% of max core involvement did not.<br />Conclusion: In low-volume GG 2, the percentage of Gleason 4 of ≤ 5% was the strongest predictor in reducing upgrading at final pathology. This easily available pathological descriptor could be used to guide urologists and patients when considering AS in this setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2168-1813
Volume :
57
Issue :
1-6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scandinavian journal of urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36683418
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2023.2165709