Early prediction of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for locally advanced esophageal cancer using 18 F-FDG PET-CT imaging: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Previous studies in locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) suggested that a change in the tumor's metabolic response, i.e., decrease of its interim ¹⁸ F-FDG uptake compared with baseline, may predict histopathological response. We evaluated the possible predictive correlation between various PET-CT and histopathological parameters following a neoadjuvant biological-containing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen.
Methods: Patients with resectable LAEC received neoadjuvant cisplatin/5-fluorouracil-based CRT and cetuximab following one cycle of induction chemotherapy and cetuximab. Changes in maximum and mean standardized uptake values (ΔSUV-max and ΔSUV-mean, respectively) and metabolic tumor volume (ΔMTV), measured by PET-CT at baseline and 2 weeks after the onset of treatment, were compared with histopathological findings at surgery. Histopathological response was defined by tumor regression grade (TRG), pathological complete response (pCR) and microscopic or macroscopic residual disease (RD).
Results: Of 18 patients, 13 (72%) with adenocarcinoma (AC) and 5 (28%) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), were included. None of the changes in the parameters of PET was associated with pCR; only ΔSUV-mean was associated with TRG in the AC cohort. In contrast, both ΔSUV-mean% and ΔSUV-max% were significantly associated with RD, both in the whole cohort and in the AC cohort. Changes in FDG-uptake predicted RD2 at surgery: only patients with less than 13% decrease in SUV-mean% or less than 29% decrease in SUV-max% had RD2, while all patients with RD0 or RD1 had greater reductions [100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV)].
Conclusions: Changes in ΔSUV-max and ΔSUV-mean after two weeks of onset of cetuximab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LAEC may predict macroscopic RD but not TRG or pCR at surgery.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-22-352/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)