Mesial or distal to canine: Which is better for the position of closing loops? Analysis of tooth movements based on numerical simulation.

Introduction: Although many studies investigating the mechanical behavior of loop mechanics have focused on loop designs to produce a higher moment-to-force ratio, few studies have clarified the effect of loop position on the force system and resultant tooth movements. This study aimed to simulate orthodontic tooth movements during space closure and to compare the effects of loop position in association with different degrees of gable bend on tooth movements using the finite element method.
Methods: Two finite element models of the maxillary dentition were constructed, with the loop placed mesial or distal to the canine. Tooth movements during loop activation were simulated while varying the degree of gable bend.
Results: When the loop was placed distal to the canine, the incisor showed uncontrolled tipping even with the gable bend. Placement of the loop mesial to the canine produced controlled tipping or root movement of the incisor, depending on the degree of gable bend.
Conclusions: Placement of the closing loop mesial to the canine in combination with the incorporation of a gable bend into the archwire distal to the canine could provide better control of incisor movements, such as controlled tipping or root movement, as compared with placement of a gable bend into the loop located distal to the canine.
(Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)