Back to Search
Start Over
Quantitative futility in emergency laparotomy: an exploration of early-postoperative death in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit.
- Source :
-
Techniques in coloproctology [Tech Coloproctol] 2023 Sep; Vol. 27 (9), pp. 729-738. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 07. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: Quantitative futility is an appraisal of the risk of failure of a treatment. For those who do not survive, a laparotomy has provided negligible therapeutic benefit and may represent a missed opportunity for palliation. The aim of this study was to define a timeframe for quantitative futility in emergency laparotomy and investigate predictors of futility using the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database.<br />Methods: A two-stage methodology was used; stage one defined a timeframe for futility using an online survey and steering group discussion; stage two applied this definition to patients enrolled in NELA December 2013-December 2020 for analysis. Futility was defined as all-cause mortality within 3 days of emergency laparotomy. Baseline characteristics of this group were compared to all others. Multilevel logistic regression was carried out with potentially clinically important predictors defined a priori.<br />Results: Quantitative futility occurred in 4% of patients (7442/180,987). Median age was 74 years (range 65-81 years). Median NELA risk score was 32.4% vs. 3.8% in the surviving cohort (pā<ā0.001). Early mortality patients more frequently presented with sepsis (pā<ā0.001). Significant predictors of futility included age, arterial lactate and cardiorespiratory co-morbidity. Frailty was associated with a 38% increased risk of early mortality (95% CI 1.22-1.55). Surgery for intestinal ischaemia was associated with a two times greater chance of futile surgery (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.50-2.85).<br />Conclusions: Quantitative futility after emergency laparotomy is associated with quantifiable risk factors available to decision-makers preoperatively. These findings should be incorporated qualitatively by the multidisciplinary team into shared decision-making discussions with extremely high-risk patients.<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1128-045X
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Techniques in coloproctology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36609892
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02747-1