Rift Valley Fever vaccine strategies: Enhanced stability of RVF Clone 13.

Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV) causes the zoonotic RVF disease, which results in substantial economic losses in livestock industries. Regular vaccination of livestock against RVF is necessary to generate long-term immunity and avoid the loss of livestock. The live attenuated vaccine based on Clone 13 virus strain has been used to reduce the negative impact of RVF disease. The vaccine strain is heat labile and requires stringent conditions for storage and handling. This research evaluated lactose and sucrose-based stabilizers coupled with lyophilisation to enhance stability of the RVF Clone 13 vaccine strain. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the sucrose-RVF vaccine was 97.0 °C with average residual moisture of below 2 %. The lactose formulation was characterised with Tg of 83.5 °C and residual moisture of above 2 %. The RVF Clone 13 sucrose-based formulation maintained higher antigen titres during lyophilisation compared to the lactose-formulated vaccine. Cellular-mediated and humoral immunity was evaluated and compared for the two newly formulated vaccines. Pheroid® technology was also investigated as a potential adjuvant and its ability to further enhance the immunogenicity conferred by the RVF Clone 13 vaccine formulations in Merino sheep. No adverse reactions were observed following injection of the vaccine formulations in mice, guinea pigs and Merino sheep. Comparable protective humoral immune responses against RVF were obtained for all animals vaccinated with the lactose and sucrose-based stabilisers with and without the Pheroid® adjuvant. No proliferation of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells as well as expression of IFN-γ was observed for all animals group vaccinated with Pheroid® only. Specific CD8+ IFN-γ+T-cells were expressed at higher levels compared to the CD4+ IFN-γ+T-cells in the RVF Clone 13 vaccines, suggesting that cellular immunity against RVF is through the Class I antigen presentation pathway.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)