Back to Search Start Over

Upfront autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone consolidation with carfilzomib maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in England and Wales (CARDAMON): a randomised, phase 2, non-inferiority trial.

Authors :
Yong K
Wilson W
de Tute RM
Camilleri M
Ramasamy K
Streetly M
Sive J
Bygrave CA
Benjamin R
Chapman M
Chavda SJ
Phillips EH
Del Mar Cuadrado M
Pang G
Jenner R
Dadaga T
Kamora S
Cavenagh J
Clifton-Hadley L
Owen RG
Popat R
Source :
The Lancet. Haematology [Lancet Haematol] 2023 Feb; Vol. 10 (2), pp. e93-e106. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 15.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is bortezomib-based induction followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and lenalidomide maintenance. We aimed to evaluate whether an immunomodulatory-free carfilzomib-based induction, consolidation, and maintenance protocol without autologous HSCT was non-inferior to the same induction regimen followed by autologous HSCT and maintenance.<br />Methods: CARDAMON is a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 19 hospitals in England and Wales, UK. Newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 received four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (56 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), cyclophosphamide (500 mg orally on days 1, 8, and 15), and dexamethasone (40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; KCd), followed by peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation. Patients with at least a partial response were randomly assigned (1:1) to either high-dose melphalan and autologous HSCT or four cycles of KCd. All randomised patients received 18 cycles of carfilzomib maintenance (56 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction and difference in progression-free survival rate at 2 years from randomisation (non-inferiority margin 10%), both assessed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who started treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02315716); recruitment is complete and all patients are in follow-up.<br />Findings: Between June 16, 2015, and July 8, 2019, 281 patients were enrolled, with 218 proceeding to randomisation (109 assigned to the KCd consolidation group [99 of whom completed consolidation] and 109 to the HSCT group [104 of whom underwent transplantation]). A further seven patients withdrew before initiation of carfilzomib maintenance (two in the KCd consolidation group vs five in the HSCT group). Median age was 59 years (IQR 52 to 64); 166 (59%) of 281 patients were male and 115 (41%) were female. 152 (71%) of 214 patients with known ethnicity were White, 37 (17%) were Black, 18 (8%) were Asian, 5 (2%) identified as Mixed, and 2 (1%) identified as other. Median follow-up from randomisation was 40·2 months (IQR 32·7 to 51·8). After induction, 162 (57·7%; 95% CI 51·6 to 63·5) of 281 patients had at least a very good partial response. The 2-year progression-free survival was 75% (95% CI 65 to 82) in the HSCT group versus 68% (95% CI 58 to 76) in the KCd group (difference -7·2%, 70% CI -11·1 to -2·8), exceeding the non-inferiority margin. The most common grade 3-4 events during KCd induction and consolidation were lymphocytopenia (72 [26%] of 278 patients who started induction; 15 [14%] of 109 patients who started consolidation) and infection (50 [18%] of 278 for induction; 15 [14%] of 109 for consolidation), and during carfilzomib maintenance were hypertension (20 [21%] of 97 patients in the KCd consolidation group vs 23 [23%] of 99 patients in the HSCT group) and infection (16 [16%] of 97 patients vs 25 [25%] of 99). Treatment-related serious adverse events at any point during the trial were reported in 109 (39%) of 278 patients who started induction, with infections (80 [29%]) being the most common. Treatment-emergent deaths were reported in five (2%) of 278 patients during induction (three from infection, one from cardiac event, and one from renal failure) and one of 99 patients during maintenance after autologous HSCT (oesophageal carcinoma).<br />Interpretation: KCd did not meet the criteria for non-inferiority compared with autologous HSCT, but the marginal difference in progression-free survival suggests that further studies are warranted to explore deferred autologous HSCT in some subgroups, such as individuals who are MRD negative after induction.<br />Funding: Cancer Research UK and Amgen.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KY receives honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, and Sanofi; and research funding from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Autolus. KR receives honoraria from Karyopharm, Pfizer Oncology, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; is a member of an advisory committee for Karyopharm, Pfizer Oncology, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Adaptive Biotech, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; receives fees for travel from Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, and Bristol Myers Squibb; receives fees for conference registration from Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), Karyopharm, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Abbvie; and receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline. MS receives consultancy fees from Celgene, Sanofi, and EUSA Pharma. LC-H receives research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb. RGO receives honoraria from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca, and is a member of an advisory committee for Janssen and Beigene. RP receives consultancy fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, and Celgene; honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Amgen, and Takeda; research funding from GlaxoSmithKline; fees for travel, fees for accommodation, and expenses from Takeda; and fees for travel from Janssen and Bristol Myers Squibb. The haematology team at the Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre (LC-H, GP, RJ, TD, WW, and SK) has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to sponsor and coordinate clinical trials from Amgen, Celgene, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Janssen, Pfizer, and Millennium Pharmaceuticals. All other authors declare no competing interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2352-3026
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Lancet. Haematology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36529145
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00350-7