Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of financial conflicts of interest and quality of evidence in Japanese gastroenterology clinical practice guidelines.

Authors :
Murayama A
Kamamoto S
Murata N
Yamasaki R
Yamada K
Yamashita E
Saito H
Tanimoto T
Ozaki A
Source :
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology [J Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2023 Apr; Vol. 38 (4), pp. 565-573. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 29.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines assist healthcare professionals in providing evidence-based care. However, pharmaceutical companies' financial interests often influence guideline content. This study aimed to elucidate the magnitude of financial ties among Japanese gastroenterology guideline authors and the pharmaceutical industry.<br />Methods: Using pharmaceutical company disclosed payment data, we evaluated financial conflicts of interest (COI) among Japanese Society of Gastroenterology guideline authors between 2016 and 2021. Additionally, we assessed the evidence quality supporting guideline recommendations and associations with financial COI. Finally, we evaluated author COI management during guideline development against global standards.<br />Results: Overall, 88.2% (231/262) of guideline authors received a median of $12 968 (interquartile range [IQR]: $1839-$70 374) in payments between 2016 and 2019 for lectures, writings, and consulting. Chairpersons received significantly higher payments (median: $86 444 [IQR: $15 455-$165 679]). Notably, 41 (15.6%) authors had undeclared payments exceeding declaration requirements. Low or very low-quality evidence supported 41.0% of recommendations. There was a negative association between the median 4-year payment per author and the proportion of recommendations based on low-quality evidence (odds ratio: 0.966 [95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.945-0.987], P = 0.002) and positive association with moderate-quality evidence (odds ratio: 1.018 [95% CI: 1.011-1.025], P < 0.001). Still, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology guideline development process remains less transparent, with insufficient COI policies relative to global standards.<br />Conclusion: There were extensive financial COI between pharmaceutical companies and guideline authors, and more than 40% of recommendations were based on low-quality evidence. More rigorous and transparent COI policies for guideline development adhering to global standards are warranted.<br /> (© 2022 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1440-1746
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36518089
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16089