Back to Search Start Over

Influence of humeral lengthening on clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors :
Hao KA
Dean EW
Hones KM
King JJ
Schoch BS
Dean NE
Farmer KW
Struk AM
Wright TW
Source :
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR [Orthop Traumatol Surg Res] 2023 Jun; Vol. 109 (4), pp. 103502. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 05.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Deltoid tensioning secondary to humeral lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly theorized to be crucial to improving range of motion (ROM) but may predispose patients to acromial/scapular spine fractures and neurologic injury. Clinical evidence linking patient outcomes to humeral lengthening is limited. This study assesses the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA.<br />Methods: A single institution review of 284 RSAs performed in 265 patients was performed. Humeral lengthening was defined as the difference in the subacromial height preoperatively to postoperatively as measured on Grashey radiographs. The subacromial height was measured as the vertical difference between the most inferolateral aspect of the acromion and the most superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was assessed on a continuous basis. Secondarily, clinical outcomes were assessed using a dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening (≤25 vs. >25mm) based on prior clinical and biomechanical work purporting a correlation with clinical outcomes. Improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ROM and outcome scores after RSA were also compared.<br />Results: Humeral lengthening demonstrated a nonlinear relationship with postoperative ROM, clinical outcome scores, and shoulder strength and their improvement preoperatively to postoperatively. Furthermore, there were minimal differences in ROM measures, outcome scores, and shoulder strength when stratified using the dichotomous definition of humeral lengthening. No difference in the proportion of patients exceeding the MCID or SCB when stratified by humeral lengthening ≤25 vs. >25mm was found. There was no difference in humeral lengthening in patients with versus without complications.<br />Conclusion: No clear relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was identified. The previously purported 25mm threshold for humeral lengthening did not predict improved patient outcomes. Outcomes after RSA are multifactorial; the relationship between humeral lengthening and outcomes is likely confounded by other patient and surgical factors.<br />Level of Evidence: IV; Case Series.<br /> (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1877-0568
Volume :
109
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36470370
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103502