Mucus adhesion vs. mucus penetration? Screening nanomaterials for nasal inhalation by MD simulation.

Nanocarrier-aided drug delivery techniques have improved the absorption and permeability of drugs in nose-to-brain delivery. However, the molecular properties of nanocarriers during the delivery process are of great interest; in particular, the characteristics when penetrating barriers in vivo are crucial for the screening and optimization of materials for nasal inhalation. In this study, we have focused on two types of delivery systems: mucoadhesive nanoparticles (MAPs) and mucopenetrating nanoparticles (MPPs); both have been widely used for mucosal delivery, although a method for selecting the more effective type of drug carriers for mucosal delivery has not been established. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to reveal the all-atom dynamic characteristics of the interaction between different delivery systems and the nasal mucus protein MUC5AC. Among the systems tested, hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride chitosan (HTCC) had the strongest interaction with mucin, suggesting it had better mucoadhesive performance, and that it interacted with MUC5AC more strongly than unmodified chitosan. In contrast, the mucus-penetrating material polyethylene glycol-poly lactic acid-co-glycolic acid (PEG-PLGA), had almost no interaction with MUC5AC. The results of the MD simulations were verified by in vitro experiments on nanoparticles (NPs) and mucin binding. The drug delivery performance of the four types of NPs, analyzed by in vitro and ex vivo mucosal penetration, were all generally consistent with the properties of the material predicted from the MD simulation. These clues to the molecular mechanism of MAPs and MPPs may provide useful insight into the screening and optimization of nanomaterials suitable for nasal inhalation.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)