Forward and reverse dosimetry for aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline in humans extrapolated from humanized-liver mouse data using simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic models.

Although human urinary aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline were unexpectedly detected in biomonitoring data, little is known about the daily intake doses of aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline in the living environment or their relation to tolerable daily intake (TDI) values in humans. In the current study, to evaluate the daily oral intake of aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline in humans, forward and reverse dosimetry was carried out using simplified in silico physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling established using in vivo experimental pharmacokinetic data. These data were from humanized-liver mice after single oral doses of 100 mg/kg aniline (previously determined) and 116 mg/kg 2,6-dimethylanine (currently investigated). The in vivo elimination rates of 2,6-dimethylaniline from plasma in humanized-liver mice were generally slow compared with those of aniline. Faster in vitro metabolic elimination rates of aniline mediated by liver 9000 × g supernatant fractions from rats than those from humans may suggest the existence of higher first-pass effects in rats than in humanized-liver mice. In silico aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline concentration curves in human urine after virtual oral administrations were estimated by human PBPK models created with data from humanized-liver mice. Reverse dosimetry analysis using human PBPK models estimated the daily intake of aniline, based on reported human urinary concentrations in biomonitoring data, to be roughly similar to the aniline TDI level. These results suggest that forward and reverse dosimetry using simplified human PBPK models founded on data from humanized-liver mice can be used to evaluate possible higher than expected exposures of aniline and 2,6-dimethylaniline in humans.