Back to Search Start Over

Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.

Authors :
Pang L
Mou K
Li Y
Li T
Li J
Zhu J
Tang X
Source :
The American journal of sports medicine [Am J Sports Med] 2023 Oct; Vol. 51 (12), pp. 3313-3324. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 29.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important stabilizer of lateral dislocation of the patella. Single-limb (SL) and double-limb (DL) graft MPFL reconstructions have been increasingly used to treat recurrent patellar dislocations, but the clinical efficacy of SL versus DL graft MPFL reconstructions remains controversial owing to the inconsistent conclusions of previous studies.<br />Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SL and DL graft MPFL reconstructions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.<br />Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.<br />Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The retrieval time was up to July 25, 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.<br />Results: A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies with 451 patients were included. The joint stability and functional scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline. When compared with SL graft reconstruction, DL graft reconstruction provided reduced recurrent instability ( P = .01), anterior patella-related pain ( P = .02), and patellar lateral shift rate ( P = .02). Regarding functional recovery, patients undergoing DL graft reconstruction presented better scores on the Kujala ( P < .001), Tegner ( P = .009), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ( P < .001) but similar Lysholm scores as compared with SL graft reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in the reduction of the patellar tilt angle, complications other than anterior patella-related pain, or postoperative pain.<br />Conclusion: When compared with SL graft MPFL reconstruction, DL graft MPFL reconstruction yielded better outcomes in terms of postoperative recurrent instability, anterior patella-related pain, patellar lateral shift rate, Kujala score, Tegner score, and IKDC score. The amount of high-quality evidence is insufficient, so this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-3365
Volume :
51
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of sports medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36444888
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221130448