Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic significance of microinvasion with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis.

Authors :
Shiino S
Quinn C
Ball G
Syed BM
Kurozumi S
Tsuda H
Rakha EA
Source :
Breast cancer research and treatment [Breast Cancer Res Treat] 2023 Jan; Vol. 197 (2), pp. 245-254. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 24.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with invasive carcinoma ≤ 1 mm in size is defined as DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS/microinvasion) rather than as invasive breast carcinoma. The number of patients with microinvasion accounts for < 1% of all breast cancer in published studies. As the numbers are limited, the prognostic significance of DCIS/microinvasion has not been clearly elucidated. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the survival differences between patients with DCIS/microinvasion and those with pure DCIS.<br />Methods: A meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was performed. We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) and included observational studies published in English that contained survival details of patients with either DCIS or DCIS/microinvasion.<br />Results: This study identified 26 studies that described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients in both the DCIS and DCIS/microinvasion groups. Survival differences were evaluated in 10 of 26 studies. Disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence-free survival were significantly shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in those with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.08; p = 0.01 and hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-4.41; p = 0.001, respectively). Both overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival tended to be shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in patients with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.63-4.23; p = 0.31 and hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-4.66; p = 0.19, respectively) but the difference was not statistically significant.<br />Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that DCIS/microinvasion may display more aggressive biological and clinical behavior than pure DCIS, highlighting the potential need for closer follow-up and consideration of adjuvant treatment strategies in DCIS patients with microinvasive disease.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1573-7217
Volume :
197
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Breast cancer research and treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36427119
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06800-3