Back to Search Start Over

Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study.

Authors :
Cè M
Grimaldi E
Toto-Brocchi M
Martinenghi C
Oliva G
Felisaz PF
Schiavo P
Lunardi G
Cellina M
Source :
The neuroradiology journal [Neuroradiol J] 2023 Aug; Vol. 36 (4), pp. 397-403. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 19.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: Obstruction of the lacrimal drainage represents a common ophthalmologic issue. The blockage may interest any level of the lacrimal drainage pathway, and it is important to find the site of obstruction to plan the most appropriate treatment. In this study, findings from magnetic resonance (MR) dacryocystography were compared with findings from endoscopic and surgical procedures to evaluate the accuracy of MR dacryocystography in localizing the site of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.<br />Methods: We enrolled twenty-one patients with clinical suspicion of nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent dacryoendoscopy and surgery. MR dacryocystography was performed with a heavily T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence in the coronal planes. Before the MRI was performed, a sterile 0.9% NaCl solution was administered into both conjunctival sacs. For each examination, two independent readers (with 8 and 10 years of experience in head and neck imaging) evaluated both heavily 3D space T2-weighted and STIR sequences.<br />Results: Stenosis/obstruction of nasolacrimal duct or lacrimal sac was diagnosed in all 21 patients who underwent MRI dacryocystography. In particular, the site of the obstruction was classified as lacrimal sac in 12 (57%) patients, nasolacrimal duct in 6 (29%) patients, and canaliculi in 3 (14%) patients by both readers. By comparison with the evidence resulting from the endoscopy, there were differences between MRI dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in the evaluation of the obstruction's site in three patients, with an overall accuracy of 85.7%.<br />Conclusion: MR dacryocystography allows a non-invasive evaluation of the lacrimal drainage pathway, valid for the planning of the most appropriate treatment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2385-1996
Volume :
36
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The neuroradiology journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36404757
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009221140484