Back to Search Start Over

Protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric derisomaltose to oral ferrous sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: The IVIDA2 trial.

Authors :
Lewkowitz AK
Stout MJ
Carter EB
Ware CF
Jackson TL
D'Sa V
Deoni S
Odibo AO
Gopalakrishnan R
Liu J
Rouse DJ
Auerbach M
Tuuli MG
Source :
Contemporary clinical trials [Contemp Clin Trials] 2022 Dec; Vol. 123, pp. 106992. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 08.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common during pregnancy and associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Treatment with iron supplementation is recommended during pregnancy, but the optimal delivery route is unclear. Oral iron risks has high risk of gastrointestinal side effects and low absorption. Intravenous iron is infused directly but is expensive. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists currently recommends oral iron to treat IDA in pregnancy with intravenous iron reserved as second-line therapy, if needed. This approach is associated with persistent anemia, increasing the risk of peripartum blood transfusion. We aim to provide data on optimal route of iron repletion for IDA in pregnancy.<br />Methods: In IVIDA2, a double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter randomized trial in the United States, 746 pregnant people with moderate-to-severe IDA (hemoglobin <10 g/dL and ferritin <30 ng/mL) at 24-28 weeks' gestation will be randomized 1:1 to either a single 1000 mg dose of intravenous ferric derisomaltose and oral placebo (1-3 times daily) or a single placebo infusion with 1-3 times daily 325 mg ferrous sulfate (65 mg elemental iron) tablet. The primary outcome is peripartum blood transfusion (blood transfusion from delivery to 7 days postpartum). Secondary outcomes include adverse medication reactions, maternal and neonatal hematologic indices, and offspring neurodevelopment.<br />Ethics and Dissemination: A central ethical review board-Advarra-granted ethical approval (Pro00060930). Participating centers-Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, University of Michigan Medical Center, Washington University School of Ethics and dissemination: A central ethical review board-Advarra-granted ethical approval (Pro00060930). Participating centers-Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, University of Michigan Medical Center, Washington University School of.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The study is funded by the NICHD (R01 HD105855; PI: Methodius Tuuli) and supported by an unrestricted grant from Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. (MPI: Methodius Tuuli & Adam Lewkowitz). Neither NICHD nor Pharmacosmos Therapeutics, Inc has no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript and the decision to submit for publication. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NICHD or Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1559-2030
Volume :
123
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Contemporary clinical trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36368479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2022.106992