Back to Search Start Over

Radiographic Response of Solitary Plasmacytomas After Conformal Radiotherapy May Be Delayed: Outcomes in the 3D Era.

Authors :
Kosydar S
Gulhane A
Libby E
Cowan AJ
Kwok M
Lee SS
Green DJ
Coffey D
Holmberg LA
Chen DL
Tseng YD
Source :
American journal of clinical oncology [Am J Clin Oncol] 2022 Nov 01; Vol. 45 (11), pp. 443-449. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objective: Although recurrence rates after radiotherapy for solitary plasmacytoma (SP) are well established, little is known about how SP responds radiographically, as most historical patients were treated in the 2D era. We evaluated the response to radiotherapy among SP patients staged and treated with 3D techniques, including proton therapy, which has not yet been previously reported.<br />Methods and Materials: Between 2007 and 2021, 15 SP patients (4 extramedullary, 11 bone) staged with 3D imaging and bone marrow evaluation were consecutively treated with definitive radiotherapy. The best response was categorized in 9 evaluable patients according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST).<br />Results: With a median follow-up of 34 months, 4 patients relapsed. The median time to the best response was ~2 years (26.6 mo RECIST, 25.4 mo PERCIST). Response rates differed based on response assessment criteria. PERCIST was associated with higher rates of complete (85.7%) or partial response (14.3%) compared with RECIST (16.7% complete, 33.3% partial). Two-year and 4-year PFS for extramedullary SP were 100% and 75%, compared with 91% and 55% for bone ( P =0.75). Patients treated with proton therapy (n=5) did not appear to have different patterns of relapse (1 marginal, 1 distant) compared with those treated with photons or electrons (n=10; 2 distant).<br />Conclusions: More conformal dose distribution with proton therapy does not appear to alter patterns of recurrence. Although response rates differ based on criteria by both RECIST and PERCIST assessments, the radiographic response may be slow and requires validation in other cohorts.<br />Competing Interests: No author received any source of funding or support for this work. A.J.C.: Research funding: Janssen, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Adaptive, Sanofi, Nektar, Harpoon. Consultancy: Janssen, Abbvie, BMS, Sanofi, Secura Bio, Celgene, GSK, EUSA, Allogene. L.A.H.: Research funding: Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Millennium Takada, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Janssen. Royalty: Up-To-Date. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-453X
Volume :
45
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of clinical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36346953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000948