Implementation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays in the United States.

Background: Few data exist regarding the implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays in the United States since their approval.
Objectives: This study sought to explore trends in hs-cTn assay implementation over time and assess the association of their use with in-hospital cardiac testing and outcomes.
Methods: The study examined trends in implementation of hs-cTn assays among participating hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI [Myocardial Infarction] Registry from January 1, 2019 through September 30, 2021. Associations among hs-cTn use, use of in-hospital diagnostic imaging, and patient outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equation models with logistic or gamma distributions.
Results: Among 550 participating hospitals (N = 251,000), implementation of hs-cTn assays increased from 3.3% in the first quarter of 2019 to 32.6% in the third quarter of 2021 (P _trend  < 0.001). Use of hs-cTn was associated with more echocardiography among persons with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS; 82.4% vs 75.0%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.19-1.73) but not among low-risk chest pain individuals. Use of hs-cTn was associated with less invasive coronary angiography among low-risk patients (3.7% vs 4.5%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) but similar use for patients with NSTE-ACS. There was no association between hs-cTn use and noninvasive stress testing or coronary computed tomography angiography testing. Among individuals with NSTE-ACS, hs-cTn use was not associated with revascularization or in-hospital mortality. Use of hs-cTn was associated with a shorter length of stay (median 47.6 hours vs 48.0 hours; ratio: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.98).
Conclusions: Implementation of hs-cTn among U.S. hospitals is increasing, but most U.S. hospitals continue to use less sensitive assays. The use of hs-cTn was associated with modestly shorter length of stay, greater use of echocardiography for NSTE-ACS, and less use of invasive angiography among low-risk patients.
Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was supported by the American College of Cardiology’s National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). The views expressed in this manuscript represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCDR or its associated professional societies identified at CVQuality.ACC.org/NCDR. Dr McCarthy has received support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) T32 postdoctoral training grant (5T32HL094301-12); and has received consulting income from Abbott Laboratories. Dr Wang has received research grants to the Duke Clinical Research Institute from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Cryolife, Chiesi, Merck, Portola, and Regeneron; and has received consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cryolife, and Novartis. Dr Sandoval has served on advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics without personal financial compensation; and has also been a speaker without personal financial compensation for Abbott Diagnostics. Dr Smilowitz has received partial support from a Career Development Award from NHLBI (K23HL150315); and has received consulting honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr Wasfy has received support from the American Heart Association (18 CDA 34110215). Dr de Lemos has received grant support from Abbott Diagnostics and Roche Diagnostics; and has received consulting income from Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Quidel, Beckman Coulter, and Siemens’s Health Care Diagnostics. Dr Kontos has served as chair of the Chest Pain-MI Steering committee. Dr Apple has served as an Associate Editor of Clinical Chemistry; has participated in the advisory boards of Werfen, Siemens Healthineers, and Qorvo Biotechnology; has received consulting income from AWE Medical and Hytest; and has received cardiac biomarker grant support (nonsalaried) through his institutional research institute from Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott POC, Siemens Healthcare, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Beckman Coulter, BD, and Quidel. Dr Daniels has received consulting income from Quidel, Roche, and Siemens; and has participated in clinical endpoint committees or data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, and Quidel. Dr Newby has received research grant support from Roche Diagnostics and BioKier; and has received consulting honoraria from Beckman-Coulter, CSL, and Medtronic. Dr Jaffe has served as a consultant for Abbott, Beckman-Coulter, Siemens, Roche, Ortho Diagnostics, Radiometer, ET Healthcare, Sphingotec, Astellas, RCE Technologies, Amgen, and Novartis. Dr Januzzi has served as a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, HeartFlow Inc, Innolife, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, and Roche Diagnostics; and has participated in clinical endpoint committees or data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Bayer, CVRx, Pfizer, and Takeda. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
(Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)